Home | News And Society | Pure-opinion
What if the United States and other first world nations around the world which are feeding the poor in the third world give all future food with a caveat? What if we told them that the food they eat will have salt peter in it and also temporary sterilization properties. This would prevent those who cannot support additional mouths to feed the temporary in-ability to breed?Is it ethical to give food to Africans and the poor of the World with Human Sterilization Ingredients mixed in? Some say this is not ethical and yet, I think I disagree. For instance since the food is free no one has to take it; they have a choice. Those who produce and work can have offspring as they will be able to feed them. Those who do not work or cannot afford to feed additional mouths will not bring children into the world, as most likely they might die of starvation.For those who condemn this thought or premise let it be known that there are already too many people on this Planet and huge food shortages as well. As the human population rises to 10, 20 and eventually 50 billion people the planet cannot support or sustain it. Soon some 4 to 5 Billion people will be without sustainable water supplies. 43,500 children are born each day and most are born into severe poverty. We cannot feed them all; it is time to face reality.We need to be thinking ahead with our minds not only our hearts. I certainly hope this article is of interest and that is has propelled thought. The goal is simple, to help you in your quest to be the best in 2007. I thank you for reading my many articles on diverse subjects, which interest you.
Article Source: http://www.content.onlypunjab.com
"Lance Winslow" - If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/. Lance is a guest writer for Our Spokane Magazine in Spokane, Washington
Please Rate this Article
5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5
Not yet Rated
