Impossible Issues

At its core, evolutionary theory suggests that life evolved through minute changes within organisms over long periods of time. These small changes, we are told, eventually make up all life and the complex systems that comprise our being.

If we are to accept this as true, how would the heart, which requires the brain to tell it to beat, function during its intermediary stages while the brain was evolving? When did the heart, which is a whole system by itself, decide to evolve and become a complex circulatory system? How did this circulatory system evolve in small increments separate from the heart if it needs all of its parts together to function?

What about the nervous system? When did a primitive unintelligent organism decide that it needed to develop a nervous system? Why did the organism need a nervous system if it survived without one? Why did it need a heart if it survived without one? When did a primitive organism decide it needed a muscular system, a respiratory system, and a digestive system?

How exactly did all of these complex systems evolve separate from each other if they need to work together to function?

Survival of the fittest is the principle that drives the evolutionary process. If these primitive creatures survived, why did they need to evolve beyond where they were? What made them grow and change? What made these primitive organisms decide they needed to become something different? Something better? Since there were no laws or purpose to govern these organisms, why did they need to change?

I am always amazed that the human race has known so little about what makes the complex systems that formulate life, yet people assume unintelligent organisms were able to create these things through a natural selection process.

How could we or any other creature develop such incredible complexity when we have struggled to understand the systems that define us as humans? This scenario is like suggesting that a baby designed a fully functional computer system. The baby has no idea how a computer system operates or for that matter, what it is, yet, this baby somehow developed the computer system.

Would you believe this story if it were reported on national television tonight? Yet, we are asked to accept the story that all life exists due to random unintelligent processes (something less than a baby’s intelligence). We are also asked to agree that these unintelligent forces somehow knew enough to create all of the complex systems we see in our world. This would even seem to be a fanciful scenario for the Brothers Grimm because to accept this line of reasoning requires a suspension of commonly understood reality. It also requires much more faith than saying a transcendent intelligence created all life.

Those that make the choice to hold to the theory of evolution no matter what the evidence suggests will come up with explanation that insists on making assumptions that suspend rational thought. This theory defies logic and does not conform to solid observable scientific discovery. The theory of evolution does not make sense in light of other multiple observations we can make about our known world.

Maybe evolution sounds impossible because it is impossible.

Article Source: http://www.content.onlypunjab.com

Discover truth using simple everyday logic. Learn the truth about evolution and intelligent design. Articles, debate, and more. Obvious Truths: www.obvioustruths.com/

Please Rate this Article

5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5 

Not yet Rated